5 Comments
User's avatar
Labellecurvesansmerci's avatar

They create this proprietory Inner World that claims to supercede the real, in an attempt to destroy The Real. Nobody owns oxygen. Yet. We should stare into the Orb, giveaway our Us, and die gracefully, allowing our virtual dopplegangers to trade virtual O² as ai turns our atmo to zeon. 🤔 or not.

Paul Elison's avatar

The agent ecosystem just got its search engine spec — but none of the companies that wrote it have published the equivalent of a web page yet.

GH's avatar

Quite an ecosystem being created.

Like AI output in general it seems to keep growing without any fitness factors.

Jordamøn's avatar

People might not like the tools, but nobody can deny their effectiveness.

GH's avatar

I use AI daily for lots of things and I wouldn't agree they are effective in the last 10%.

For most uses, this is good enough. For any use where an expert will finish that last 10%, also good enough.

For how they are being used in non-trivial software, all the improvements reduce the ability to get to 100% ever.

So in most cases this is true, but for software we can count the non-trivial vibe coding successes on zero fingers. And their fitness benchmark is solving problems they were given the answers for in training, which they can reproduce.